Lecture 5 (Part 3 Mauna Loa CO2) – Data 100, Spring 2024¶

Data 100, Fall 2024

Acknowledgments Page

A demo of data cleaning and exploratory data analysis using the Mauna Loa CO2 data.

In [1]:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
In [2]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
#%matplotlib inline
plt.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = (12, 9)

import plotly.express as px

sns.set()
sns.set_context('talk')
np.set_printoptions(threshold=20, precision=2, suppress=True)
pd.set_option('display.max_rows', 30)
pd.set_option('display.max_columns', None)
pd.set_option('display.precision', 2)
# This option stops scientific notation for pandas
pd.set_option('display.float_format', '{:.2f}'.format)

# Silence some spurious seaborn warnings
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", category=FutureWarning)

Data Faithfulness: Mauna Loa CO2 data¶

CO2 concentrations have been monitored at Mauna Loa Observatory since 1958 (website link).

In [3]:
co2_file = "data/co2_mm_mlo.txt"

Let's do some EDA!!

How do we read the file into Pandas?¶

Let's instead check out this file with JupyterLab.

  • Note it's a .txt file.
  • Do we trust this file extension?
  • What structure is it?






Looking at the first few lines of the data, we spot some relevant characteristics:

  • The values are separated by white space, possibly tabs.
  • The data line up down the rows. For example, the month appears in 7th to 8th position of each line.
  • The 71st and 72nd lines in the file contain column headings split over two lines.

We can use read_csv to read the data into a Pandas data frame, and we provide several arguments to specify that the separators are white space, there is no header (we will set our own column names), and to skip the first 72 rows of the file.

In [4]:
co2 = pd.read_csv(
    co2_file, 
    header = None, 
    comment = "#",
    sep = r'\s+'       #delimiter for continuous whitespace (stay tuned for regex next lecture))
)
co2.head()
Out[4]:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1958 3 1958.21 315.71 315.71 314.62 -1
1 1958 4 1958.29 317.45 317.45 315.29 -1
2 1958 5 1958.38 317.50 317.50 314.71 -1
3 1958 6 1958.46 -99.99 317.10 314.85 -1
4 1958 7 1958.54 315.86 315.86 314.98 -1

Congratulations! You've wrangled the data!


...But our columns aren't named. We need to do more EDA.

Exploring Variable Feature Types¶

The NOAA webpage might have some useful tidbits (in this case it doesn't). Let's go back to the raw data file to identify each feature.

We'll rerun pd.read_csv, but this time with some custom column names.

In [5]:
co2 = pd.read_csv(
    co2_file, 
    header = None, 
    comment = "#",
    sep = '\s+', #regex for continuous whitespace (next lecture)
    names = ['Yr', 'Mo', 'DecDate', 'Avg', 'Int', 'Trend', 'Days']
)
co2.head()
Out[5]:
Yr Mo DecDate Avg Int Trend Days
0 1958 3 1958.21 315.71 315.71 314.62 -1
1 1958 4 1958.29 317.45 317.45 315.29 -1
2 1958 5 1958.38 317.50 317.50 314.71 -1
3 1958 6 1958.46 -99.99 317.10 314.85 -1
4 1958 7 1958.54 315.86 315.86 314.98 -1

Visualizing CO2¶

Scientific studies tend to have very clean data, right...? Let's jump right in and make a time series plot of CO2 monthly averages.

In [6]:
# sns.lineplot(x='DecDate', y='Avg', data=co2); # plotting with seaborn
px.line(co2, x='DecDate', y='Avg', 
        markers=True, height=600)

Yikes! Plotting the data uncovered a problem. It looks like we have some missing values. What happened here?

In [7]:
co2.head()
Out[7]:
Yr Mo DecDate Avg Int Trend Days
0 1958 3 1958.21 315.71 315.71 314.62 -1
1 1958 4 1958.29 317.45 317.45 315.29 -1
2 1958 5 1958.38 317.50 317.50 314.71 -1
3 1958 6 1958.46 -99.99 317.10 314.85 -1
4 1958 7 1958.54 315.86 315.86 314.98 -1
In [8]:
co2[co2['Avg'] < 0]
Out[8]:
Yr Mo DecDate Avg Int Trend Days
3 1958 6 1958.46 -99.99 317.10 314.85 -1
7 1958 10 1958.79 -99.99 312.66 315.61 -1
71 1964 2 1964.12 -99.99 320.07 319.61 -1
72 1964 3 1964.21 -99.99 320.73 319.55 -1
73 1964 4 1964.29 -99.99 321.77 319.48 -1
213 1975 12 1975.96 -99.99 330.59 331.60 0
313 1984 4 1984.29 -99.99 346.84 344.27 2

Some data have unusual values like -1 and -99.99.

Let's check the description at the top of the file again.

  1. -1 signifies a missing value for the number of days Days the equipment was in operation that month.
  2. -99.99 denotes a missing monthly average Avg

How can we fix this? First, let's explore other aspects of our data. Understanding our data will help us decide what to do with the missing values.


Sanity Checks: Reasoning about the data¶

First, we consider the shape of the data. How many rows should we have?

  • If chronological order, we should have one record per month.
  • Data from March 1958 to August 2019.
  • We should have $ 12 \times (2019-1957) - 2 - 4 = 738 $ records.
In [9]:
co2.shape
Out[9]:
(738, 7)

Nice!! The number of rows (i.e. records) match our expectations.



Let's now check the quality of each feature.

Understanding Missing Value 1: Days¶

Days is a time field, so let's analyze other time fields to see if there is an explanation for missing values of days of operation.

Let's start with months Mo.

Are we missing any records? The number of months should have 62 or 61 instances (March 1957-August 2019).

In [10]:
co2["Mo"].value_counts().sort_index()
Out[10]:
Mo
1     61
2     61
3     62
4     62
5     62
6     62
7     62
8     62
9     61
10    61
11    61
12    61
Name: count, dtype: int64

As expected Jan, Feb, Sep, Oct, Nov, and Dec have 61 occurrences and the rest 62.



Next let's explore days Days itself, which is the number of days that the measurement equipment worked.

In [11]:
# sns.displot(co2['Days']);
# plt.title("Distribution of days feature"); # suppresses unneeded plotting output
px.histogram(co2, 'Days', title="Distribution of days feature")

In terms of data quality, a handful of months have averages based on measurements taken on fewer than half the days. In addition, there are nearly 200 missing values--that's about 27% of the data!



Finally, let's check the last time feature, year Yr.

Let's check to see if there is any connection between missingness and the year of the recording.

In [12]:
# sns.scatterplot(x="Yr", y="Days", data=co2);
# plt.title("Day field by Year"); # the ; suppresses output
px.scatter(co2, x="Yr", y="Days", title="Day field by Year")

Observations:

  • All of the missing data are in the early years of operation.
  • This could be they didn't record days of operation until the mid 70s.

Potential Next Steps:

  • Confirm these explanations through documentation about the historical readings.
  • Maybe drop earliest recordings? However, we would want to delay such action until after we have examined the time trends and assess whether there are any potential problems.



Understanding Missing Value 2: Avg¶

Next, let's return to the -99.99 values in Avg to analyze the overall quality of the CO2 measurements.

In [13]:
# Histograms of average CO2 measurements
# sns.displot(co2['Avg']);
px.histogram(co2, 'Avg')

The non-missing values are in the 300-400 range (a regular range of CO2 levels).

We also see that there are only a few missing Avg values (<1% of values). Let's examine all of them:

In [14]:
co2[co2["Avg"] < 0]
Out[14]:
Yr Mo DecDate Avg Int Trend Days
3 1958 6 1958.46 -99.99 317.10 314.85 -1
7 1958 10 1958.79 -99.99 312.66 315.61 -1
71 1964 2 1964.12 -99.99 320.07 319.61 -1
72 1964 3 1964.21 -99.99 320.73 319.55 -1
73 1964 4 1964.29 -99.99 321.77 319.48 -1
213 1975 12 1975.96 -99.99 330.59 331.60 0
313 1984 4 1984.29 -99.99 346.84 344.27 2

There doesn't seem to be a pattern to these values, other than that most records also were missing Days data.

Drop, NaN, or Impute Missing Avg Data?¶

How should we address the invalid Avg data?

A. Drop records

B. Set to NaN

C. Impute using some strategy

Remember we want to fix the following plot:

In [15]:
# sns.lineplot(x='DecDate', y='Avg', data=co2)
# plt.title("CO2 Average By Month");
px.line(co2, x='DecDate', y='Avg', title="CO2 Average By Month", 
        markers=True,
        height=400)

Since we are plotting Avg vs DecDate, we should just focus on dealing with missing values for Avg.

Let's consider a few options:

  1. Drop those records
  2. Replace -99.99 with NaN
  3. Substitute it with a likely value for the average CO2?

What do you think are the pros and cons of each possible action?



Let's examine each of these three options.

In [16]:
# 1. Drop missing values
co2_drop = co2[co2['Avg'] > 0]

# 2. Replace NaN with -99.99
co2_NA = co2.replace(-99.99, np.nan)

We'll also use a third version of the data. First, we note that the dataset already comes with a substitute value for the -99.99.

From the file description:

The interpolated column includes average values from the preceding column (average) and interpolated values where data are missing. Interpolated values are computed in two steps...

The Int feature has values that exactly match those in Avg, except when Avg is -99.99, and then a reasonable estimate is used instead. So, the third version of our data will use the Int feature instead of Avg.

In [17]:
# 3. Use interpolated column which estimates missing Avg values
co2_impute = co2.copy()
co2_impute['Avg'] = co2['Int']


What's a reasonable estimate?

To answer this question, let's zoom in on a short time period, say the measurements in 1958 (where we know we have two missing values).

In [18]:
# results of plotting data in 1958

def line_and_points(data, ax, title):
    # assumes single year, hence Mo
    ax.plot('Mo', 'Avg', data=data)
    ax.scatter('Mo', 'Avg', data=data)
    ax.set_xlim(2, 13)
    ax.set_title(title)
    ax.set_xticks(np.arange(3, 13))

def data_year(data, year):
    return data[data["Yr"] == 1958]
    
# uses matplotlib subplots
# you may see more next week; focus on output for now
fig, axes = plt.subplots(ncols = 3, figsize=(12, 4), sharey=True)

year = 1958
line_and_points(data_year(co2_drop, year), axes[0], title="1. Drop Missing")
line_and_points(data_year(co2_NA, year), axes[1], title="2. Missing Set to NaN")
line_and_points(data_year(co2_impute, year), axes[2], title="3. Missing Interpolated")

fig.suptitle(f"Monthly Averages for {year}")
plt.tight_layout()
No description has been provided for this image

In the big picture since there are only 7 Avg values missing (<1% of 738 months), any of these approaches would work.

However there is some appeal to option C: Imputing:

  • Shows seasonal trends for CO2
  • We are plotting all months in our data as a line plot


Let's replot our original figure with option 3:

In [19]:
# sns.lineplot(x='DecDate', y='Avg', data=co2_impute)
# plt.title("CO2 Average By Month, Imputed");
px.line(co2_impute, x='DecDate', y='Avg', title="CO2 Average By Month, Imputed", 
        markers=True,
        height=500)
In [20]:
px.line(co2_drop, x='DecDate', y='Avg', title="CO2 Average By Month, Droped", 
        markers=True,
        height=500)
In [21]:
px.line(co2_NA, x='DecDate', y='Avg', title="CO2 Average By Month, NaN", height=500, markers=True)

Looks pretty close to what we see on the NOAA website!

Presenting the data: A Discussion on Data Granularity¶

From the description:

  • monthly measurements are averages of average day measurements.
  • The NOAA GML website has datasets for daily/hourly measurements too.

The data you present depends on your research question.

How do CO2 levels vary by season?

  • You might want to keep average monthly data.

Are CO2 levels rising over the past 50+ years, consistent with global warming predictions?

  • You might be happier with a coarser granularity of average year data!
In [22]:
co2_year = co2_impute.groupby('Yr', as_index=False).mean()
# sns.lineplot(x='Yr', y='Avg', data=co2_year)
# plt.title("CO2 Average By Year");
px.line(co2_year, x='Yr', y='Avg', title="CO2 Average By Year", height=500)

Indeed, we see a rise by nearly 100 ppm of CO2 since Mauna Loa began recording in 1958.